For those who don't know, inting is whenever someone intentionally gives kills, gold, and exp to the enemy and makes it so the enemy has a higher chance of winning, while the team where the inter is on has a lower chance. This is a huge problem in League of Legends specifically

After a clip of a pretty popular LoL streamer surfaced where he was inting and saying "Im going to make my team lose" (or something along those lines), the LoL community wants to have this guy and everyone who ints, popular or unknown, punished. I think a way of dettering streamers and people in communities from inting, is by putting an anti inting policy in place for twitch, so those who show themselves inting on stream will be punished.

I feel like twitch shouldn't allow popular streamers who somewhat represent their platform to get away with flaming and inting in game. It sets a bad example, and we should be able to report streamers who int in any game, whether it be Overwatch, LoL, Valorant, or any game where inting is a thing.

I know Twitch CEO went over this at Twitch-con San Diego 2019 with some good pluses towards this better chance. I have no idea when that will be implemented into today's Twitch Moderation, but hopefully sooner rather than later.

But anyways, some things he did not mention was these ideas and should add-on or I would recommend a complete overhaul on the enforcement.

• We should be able to see in our own dashboards of previous infractions that are on the account and not removed due to being expired or mistakened suspensions. We, as live streamers, or even users (non-live streamers) should have this access than we taking our own record keeping off the platform (which I still recommend especially when we are incorrectly suspended we'd be unable to view this data, at least with the current method of suspensions). Give examples and details on the community guidelines pages. Yes, I understand you want to make it easy to consume and appealing to read for the masses, but learn from other platforms with their community guidelines. Make videos even, pictures, and visual aids. They work.
• On-stream violations, like actual violations, should suspend from streaming on their own channel only. Being a guest on another stream should be fine and not a death sentence to another streamer. The suspended streamer isn’t the #1 focus of the stream of course but still apart of the stream. I guess in some cases you/Twitch don’t want to associate with certain levels of suspended streamers and if that level is more extreme then yeah it’s understandable they shouldn’t be a guest on any streams on Twitch. But lower level should be fine. And your dashboard should show this level too for you, as the streamer know to not go onto any streams to be a guest as well.
• Also you shouldn’t need to take their ability to be a viewer and contribute to the overall communities on twitch and their own. I think an on-stream infraction should be completely separate than off-stream infraction. Off-stream infractions like breaking community guidelines when interacting on Twitch’s platform then suspend their ability to chat i.e. global ban. You and I know, people will always make an alt account to evade suspensions to continue to being twitch user/viewer.
• The intent thing with Twitch CEO mentioned should actually take place. CEO said if you didn’t have intent, you did not break community guidelines. And a lot of streamers granted did not read or just simply misinterpreted the community guidelines. As Twitch CEO said about safety / moderation is a global department and everyone has different in interpretations, same with live streamers, different interpretations. The suspensions should still exist for violations but it should not be indefinite based on no very clear intent. I’ve seen many live streamers banned because of misreading the context and misinterpretations from moderation. Let the live streamer give clearer context if needed than assuming as twitch moderation.

Subs get different badges the longer they are subscribed. Why don't MODS get different colored swords or different swords entirely the longer they are a mod?? If someone is in a chat and sees a mod with a sword showing they have lots of experience that person may be less likely to do or say something dumb knowing an experienced mod is in chat. Also there aren't enough mods to cover all streams so this would be a nice little thing to do for the mods. I have 500 hours in as a mod, it would nice to be recognized for that.

I keep "show moderation actions" turned on (adds ban/timeout/delete buttons next to names in chat) in the two channels I moderate.

The other day I accidentally banned someone while on the chat emote menu, with a simple jiggled-mouse misclick. Turns out the tiny sliver of ban button visible on the left side of the emote/bit panels works just fine.
I don't care whether I see it, I just don't think it should be usable. In my opinion, the only functional ban buttons should be ones with chat displayed next to them.
I can't imagine any reason a person would reasonably mean to ban someone behind there, when you can't see who's posting or what they said.

(Just in case it's relevant, I do most of my modding from my PC, browser is Firefox)

Sometimes the chat experience is impaired by trolls continually and relentlessly creating/using additional alternative accounts to repeatedly circumvent any ban, return to chat, and continue spamming or harassing the channel.

I suggest that Twitch provide an additional set of moderation commands, capabilities, and information in the chat-related APIs and IRC interfaces to assist broadcasters and their channel bots to control abuse in these types of situations.

Some ideas for suggested channel Moderator Commands/Options to Add:

• "Approved" chatters list - A List/Hash table of unlimited size for any users manually approved by a moderator to chat plus a list of all the users who have in the past already sent a chat message to the channel before and not been Banned or Purged since their last message.

• Two-Levels of Approval that can be applied to any Chatter: (1) Automatic/Normal, (2) Validated by Channel Extension or AddOn, and (3) Moderator-Sanctioned Approval
  ** An "Approved-Users Only Chat Mode", for emergencies, separate from Followers-Only chat that can be set to either Level 1, 2, or 3.
  ** An additional option for FollowerOnly,SubOnly, EmoteOnly chat to make "Approved" chatters exempt that can be set to either "Level 1", "Level 2", or "Level 3" Approved chatters.

• Option to Require Two-Factor Enabled on non-Mod Twitch accounts to send chat messages (Essentially, the chatter will have verified one step beyond e-mail address).

** Suboption to exempt users from 2fa requirement "just to chat" who meet another criteria such as "Subscribed, Approved Level 1, Approved Level 2, Approved Level 3, Chatted here before, Prime/Turbo user, or Account older than X days"

/GBAN - "Ghost Ban" / "Stealth Ban" - The same exact usage as the traditional /BAN command; However, when chat messages by affected user are purged the CLEARCHAT IRC message will be restricted to users not affected by a ban -- No chat connections from the user affected by the ban will receive any feedback or user-interface change showing that offending messages have been removed, nor that they are now affected by a ban. Everyone else in the channel will see the CLEARCHAT / <message deleted> entries for the Ghostbanned user. If the GBAN'ed user tries to send additional messages to the channel, the server should simulate that they have gone through successfully.

/WBAN <user> [<{IP|SUBNET|SITE}>] [<{EMAIL|EMAILDOMAIN}>] [<LEVEL>] - "Watchlist Ban" - A type of automatic ban based on details watchlisting - but a channel should be limited to a small number of entries, and the target user must already be Timed-Out, Normal-Banned or Stealth-Banned. A copy of the target account's IP Address, Subnet/24 or IPv6/64, Site /16 or IPv6/32, Email Address, Email Domain, Hash of payment account Id, Etc are recorded in a Hash Table of "Watch" items for the channel - The first time a new user who has never messaged the channel sends a message, their account items are checked for matches in the Watchlist hash tables, and if there is a match on a selected watch item: the new account is automatically added to the Banlist or Gbanlist - ONE TIME Only, and channel moderators should be alerted through the modlog.

An approval level is Attached to the WBAN, and Chatters at the level or Higher than the level specified are exempt from Watchlist checks.

Some ideas for suggested capabilities to Add:

• IRC Tags for chat messages that allow a channel bot to see immediately when a chat message is the "First Ever" in that account's history: chat message a new user sent to the channel, including the account's creation date.

• 3rd party external app/extension based approval of new chat users. Allow a channel to optionally require new users who join a channel for the first time to chat: grant permission for access to email and IP address data and interact with channel "Access Control" overlay extension that will provide an approval before a new chatter can post ther very first chat message (That may involve answering questions, acknowledging additional rules or policies, or verifying info, may be immediate approval, or delayed approval).

I've been spending a lot of time at Twitch for the last two years. I see that there are still very important problems that have not improved in time. This is one of the problems: for example, when large broadcasters host small broadcasters at the end of the broadcast, in the small broadcasters' chat room there can be some users who share inappropriate links, make toxicities, and make spam. Small or new publishers remain uninformed in this event. I mean, they can't handle what's going on in the chat rooms. So the broadcasters cannot do their job properly. Foreseeing that this will happen, large broadcasters do not host small broadcasters. İt is a huge impact on the shine of these small broadcasters. This also prevents the development of Twitch.

I mean, create a global moderator group of tight viewers or give more authority to the moderators who came from there. I believe that in such matters it will give a huge positive effect.