Surely you guys have seen what has recently happened with the "ASMR Category" with two big streamers. Now I will say good job on banning them. But I think those bans should uphold and remain permanent to further back up the message that states. "That type of content is not allowed on twitch"

It's too suggestive the line was pushed too far.

Unless you guys want to make an 18+ category or a whole new site altogether adhering to that. Either way some sort of enforcement needs to be put into place. With a CLEAR understanding of what is / isn't allowed

Olá.
Entendo que usuários diferentes precisam de durações de timeout diferentes, e durante uma transmissão movimentada é complicado ficar digitando nicks e durações diferentes de timeout.
Vou sugerir dois recursos

1 - Duração de timeout padrão
Tem dias que a duração de timeout padrão é muito e tem dias que é pouco; adicionar um recurso que permita ao usuário escolher o tempo padrão do timeout ao clicar com o mouse ajudaria demais os moderadores e principalmente o streamer que não tem moderadores.

2 - Recurso para configurar timeout gradativo ao clicar com o mouse
Seria interessante adicionar um recurso que permitisse ao usuário ativar a opção de timeout gradativo, que iria aumentando automaticamente a duração do timeout conforme o usuário fosse clicando para dar timeout.

Idea: Changes or the very least, more transparency on what constitutes as a ban from twitch in regards to breaking streamer guidelines. I also think it'd be fair as well if someone was banned unfairly, how they can have their repeal submission process proceed in an efficient and transparent manner as well.

Examples: Several esports players who have admitted to harassment, grooming, and assault on other community have their accounts still up and not banned (anti, cinnepie). Inversely, NairoMK who has new evidence from a lawsuit showing he was in fact a victim of **** has his account banned.

Resolution: Please reconsider how you go about banning people who've done terrible things by conducting a thorough investigation on suspect individuals (likely will have to be a case by case procedure not directed by algorithms), with transparency from twitch to the community members, and reevaluate how people who may have been unjustly banned, by being transparent in the repeal application.

Furthermore, twitch needs to be more consistent on who gets a ban vs who doesn't. Inconsistent enforcement policies from Twitch allows so many streamers who have a history of breaking the Terms of Service on their platform to continue to be able to profit off the misfortune or abuse of others.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Here's a catch of the Followers-Only mode that is bad: A spambot can follow anyone at any time and never talk anything. By the point someone turns on Followers-Only mode the bot has followed long enough to be allowed to taint the chat with spam.

And here's the solution:
Authy Badge: this would be a better "Verified Badge" than the Verified Badge, because it would confirm that the person activated 2FA, which typically involves having a phone, which typically means bots have a harder time verified themselves as a legitimate user and the Verified Badge is nothing more than "this Person is a partner, ya'll!" badge, doesn't even fit the term "verified".

Authenticated Users Only: As I said above: 2FA is a roadblock for bots. Whether it is a big roadblock or not, I don't know, but I'm pretty SURE it is better at that than whatever other spam control is currently in effect.

When a user is banned, and then creates another account, they HAVE TO register the email to the username correct? Why is it that when we report them to Twitch when they are evading a ban, or worse- constant targeted harassment towards the streamer with the usernames as mentioned below. Some of these have been suspended, others are still active.
These users have stated that they will come over, that they would end me, and even worse.
It got to the point I had to not only get my county sheriffs involved, but the FBI due to a few having our 3 year old daughter's face as a profile picture when she came into the room with me.

Username Date of Ban

pillzarenttreats 5/6/2021
crumbholio 5/6/2021
prudentgamblerscamsfolks 5/6/2021
marinevetranxstolenvalor 5/6/2021
yourgrandmothriswormfood 5/6/2021
marinevetranwillbeended 5/7/2021
letsendmarineskidsguys 5/7/2021
partyrockerguy 5/16/2021
loganrogersnotmilitary 5/16/2021
freepicks 5/17/2021
dadda5000 5/30/2021
papacockroachgaming 5/30/2021
iamcallingwandagarza 5/30/2021
rottenronny 6/10/2021
easygolf18 6/10/2021
marinevetranstolenvalor 6/10/2021
pksonofthe15 6/15/2021
jcbo49yeknom3 6/15/2021
cranterrizes 6/17/2021
deepodayz 6/17/2021
marinevetrannotmilitary 6/17/2021
thatisallfakeoffebay 6/17/2021
msellers15 6/19/2021
r1ckey1714 6/19/2021
roneeeye 6/26/2021
matinevetranxx 6/26/2021
marinevetranxstolenvlr 6/26/2021
igotmarinesadressguys 6/26/2021
waituntilicomeover 6/26/2021
marineatombomb1 6/26/2021
thekidswillpaynow 6/26/2021
thatsafakegunhahahah 6/26/2021
letstieupyourkidsbud 6/26/2021
letskxixxllmarineskids 6/26/2021
whatsmyrealnamethen 6/26/2021
theywontshowuplol 6/26/2021
marinevetranhasnarcotics 6/26/2021
takeoutthepoliceguys 6/26/2021
thecopslaughedathimhaha 6/26/2021
theycantdonothingbud 6/26/2021
marinelooksfoolishhahahah 6/26/2021
itscalledfreedom 6/26/2021
kidnapmarinesnewbornguys 6/26/2021
theynevershoweduphahahah 6/26/2021
rebasuehanncok 6/28/2021
sirmanzin 7/1/2021
gaming4fun97 7/17/2021
letstakeoutmarineskids 7/19/2021
rottennronnystrikesback 7/31/2021
mrrodgersthethird 7/31/2021
mikerodgersthe3rd 7/31/2021
kevinarianegrandover 8/9/2021
rawdawgx92 8/9/2021
realkiller99 8/9/2021
letsrxaxxpxemarinesdaugtr 8/9/2021
joinmypartybro 8/9/2021
anarchycrow_556 8/10/2021
grittyurbantellslies 8/10/2021
marineveteranskidsguys 8/10/2021
ritchie1apreeyo 8/11/2021
letskillmarineskidguys 8/11/2021

That was just the example. The solution would be A FREAKING IP BAN. You state that people can be perma banned right? What stops them from creating 20 accounts (June 26th is the reference) in a span of 3 hours.

If someone talking about suicide and/or self harm in chat, then banning someone from a platform that could potentially provide vital contact or support to them is not the answer needed for helping them.
This reddit post made by reportedly a health professional describes their experience with the issue
https://www.reddit.com/r/Twitch/comments/7d87ah/how_does_twitch_deal_with_self_harm_and_suicide/
While messages glorifying the acts should not be promoted or allowed on the site, it's important to not get rid of a potentially vital way of contacting someone who could be in serious danger. Instead, provide them with hotlines, or other direct ways to get them the support they need. The same could also apply to channels posting content like this via video. There could be better ways to deal with this, however, I am not a mental health professional, so what that could be is not my place to say, however, I implore those at Twitch to reach out to those who may know so they can handle this in the best way they can.
The reddit post I linked explains some of the reasoning behind this suggestion.

I would like to suggest that viewers be given the ability to ban themselves from channels/streamers/streams that they know are not good for their mental wellbeing, but which they cannot stop themselves from watching if it is available to them.

Similarly to how betting sites allow you to set limits on yourself, to help keep yourself in check, I would like to see users given the power to block themselves from a channel that they cannot resist typically, be it because they cannot control their financial actions, such as donations, or because they feel the channel or streamer in question provides negative feelings within the user.

This wouldn't affect, harm or punish the channel or streamer, as they would be completely unaware and wouldn't need to do anything in response, but for some viewers, such as myself, it would be a deterrent that could help improve themselves from some negative aspects of Twitch many other users don't consider.

The best thing would be a self-implemented user ban that would take 24-48 hours to undo, leaving the user with enough time to think over their action and whether or not they should undo their self-imposed ban. Alternatively, a simple permanent ban for those who feel this is the best solutions should also be made available, so users can control their exposure to streams that don't benefit them.

Hi guys, I'm new here but i'm quite angry for what happened just now to a friend of mine. She started streaming a few months ago and she is giving her all to provide her little audience with a fun, polite and interactive experience. Despite her devotion to these principles, some users in 2020 still enjoy entering chats in group only to flame, spam racist stuff and other forms of hate. I get that in some ways you can manage your chat to prevent this stuff to happen but for small streamers it's kinda hard to manage on their own. And this goes too far beyond the concept of "freedom of speech".

In my opinion, some forms of restriction should be issued right when the user creates its own account (like terms of use)or by blocking the chat from even type stuff like that (like an active control of the text box). Maybe I'm not the first one to complain about this, but the fact that this is still a thing in 2020 is unacceptable. A simple ban from the chat doesn't prevent this: people can still move to other chats and give their worst once again. And as far as i know, this is a problem that interests also big streamers sometimes, so why should we let this stuff go on?

Thanks for your attention.

vr is blowing up and with vr streamers, lately alot of vr streamers have been slipping by some of the rules and its kind of concerning. if you watch most of the streamers youll notice that the content feels more like fan service rather than a reflection to the game and/or personality. i feel like the rules for vr in general should just be more strict since the creations of most of the creators has only been sex related if not blatantly sexual. please rework some of the gameplay guidelines so that vr has specified rules since it is somewhat still new.

The Account Enforcements page states, "For the most serious offenses, we will immediately and indefinitely suspend your account with no opportunity to appeal." Yet, some users get suspended from Twitch seemingly indefinitely but somehow get their suspensions lifted. Such users need to be kept off Twitch for good, especially if they've been suspended multiple times in a short time frame.

For example, a user named DomDude64 has been suspended twice from Twitch within less than a month (9/25/2021 and 10/19/2021), but according to witness testimony, both times were supposedly permanent, and yet he successfully appeal both suspensions. His record of misconduct stretches back for almost eight years on Twitch and includes racism, ableism, sexually explicit content, bullying, doxxing, and spamming so much that he breaks stream moderation bots.

When a streamer is suspended, screenshots should be included of the violation. Streamers are bound to repeat the issue if the issue is not made clear.

Multiple staff members should see the reports before a ban is decided upon. These moderators would work separately, without the influence of one another, to decide if the ban should occur or not. If both moderators do not hit 'yes' to the ban then the ban should not occur.

An example, my latest ban happened while a Twitch Staff member was in my chat. This member did not see anything against TOS and was shocked that my ban was upheld. I still don't know what the ban was specifically for, two weeks later.

It seems there is a lack on consistency on what violates TOS and what doesn't. Screenshots and multimod verification before ban would cut down significantly on the amount of appeals and help tickets because people would understand the first time why they were ban.