Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
[Deleted User]
commented
Twitch wanting to do this shows just where their loyalties lay: paychecks for their owners, not the people streaming. Down with this corporate whitewashing of humanity, up with expression of basic human rights!
-
CyanideCarrot1
commented
The whole policy is stupid. We should be free to discuss sensitive issues without fear.
-
LilyJaneBuilds
commented
My existence as a genderfluid person isn’t controversial, and I shouldn’t need to be labeled as such. My trans friends who stream can’t just not talk about themselves at all. It’s intrinsic, not a choice, and only bigots see our existence as controversial. By forcing us to label ourselves, you are opening us up to even more hate raids, legitimizing them, and preventing the growth of communities. This does not rise to the level of international conflicts. We do not deserve to be othered or have our communities limited because some bigots may be offended by our existence. Please listen to us and remove this rule
-
Staren64
commented
My right to exist is not a "sensitive social issue", nor is people who want to take it away. It would be just as absurd to label "we should not eat babies" or "the Earth is round" as political speech.
-
ZedtheRedPup
commented
We are not social issues. We are living people who have our rights violated and voted on by others, are attacked by others, threatened, fired, evicted, tortured — all by the people who think of us as a „social issue.“
-
HippyChic111
commented
My existence isn't political.
-
minspi_24
commented
That last point encompasses everyone on the planet, except for those who are certain their gender aligns with what they were assigned at birth, individuals whose sexual orientation matches their local community's expectations, or those engaged in games that aren't LGBTQ+ inclusive.
Their notion of "sensitive" content is, quite frankly, absurd. While some may feel it’s necessary or believe they need a safe space from those who embrace diversity, that perspective is inherently subjective.
It’s objectively absurd.
-
Cragsand
commented
This change, forcing a content label on LGBTQ+ streamers talking about societal issues limiting their rights or just plain existing, is nothing but pure discrimination.
It's not only discrimination, it's also illegal in the workplace in many countries. Check with your local governance:
Sweden: https://www.do.se
UK: https://www.gov.uk/discrimination-your-rights
Germany: https://www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de
Denmark: https://workplacedenmark.dk/working-conditions/prohibition-against-discrimination
Norway: https://www.ldo.no/jobbe-for-likestilling/i-arbeidslivet/trakassering-og-seksuell-trakassering/gjengjeldelse/ -
geofinnstar
commented
people's right to exist shouldn't be a sensitive social issue
-
LinaiiSaye
commented
The idea that a group wanting human rights is controversial is genuinely insane, yet also very much in line with human history. Think about how we look at people who were pro slavery or anti women's rights now and then ask yourself: how is being anti lgbtq acceptance any different?
-
HelaFaye
commented
My existence is not controversial. Trans people have and will always exist.
-
QSquid33
commented
My existence isn't political.
-
Etheraaz
commented
The existence of LGBTQ+ people is not political. We have, do, and always will, exist.
That isn't a social issue.
-
VantaBlues
commented
LGBTQ+ is only sensitive to those that want LGBTQ+ people to not exist.
-
NightFlyerKilo
commented
Being LGBTQ+ is not something that just stops when I go home at the end of the day. It's a constant and everyday part of my identity, and I should be able to talk about that on stream without the need to label myself or in fear of a Twitch ban.
-
bestgirllilith99
commented
the existence of queer people is not political and if they talk about their lives it shouldn't be considered political someone's mere existence no matter what they happen to be shouldn't be held against them because some people are "sensitive" to them existing
-
perhaps_42
commented
Even if this policy was well intentioned, there is exactly no chance that it won’t be weaponized against vulnerable minority groups. Of course, I personally believe the policy is instead an ill-conceived attempt by a corporation to make their platform “more palatable to advertisers” by removing anything that might conceivably offend any of said advertisers’ delicate sensibilities, but regardless it is a dangerous path to take.
-
quadeamador
commented
This reminds me of how they labelled Jewish people with stars of david in Germany during the 30s-40s
-
arrowonionbelly
commented
my 24/7 transgender existence isn't inherently political, this new policy is frankly insulting
-
scentedcult
commented
I kinda get the other stuff being considered sensitive, DEPENDING on how it's being talked about. But why on earth is just the general talk of LGBTQ+ expirence.. "sensitive"? Yeah, maybe for great grandma who's dying soon anyway.