Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
StarlitLantern_
commented
I am LGBTQ+. I just want to exist, man. Why the **** is my mere existence considered political?! A "sensitive social issue"???? I AM LITERALLY JUST EXISTING AS MYSELF. WHAT ISSUE IS THERE WITH THAT HUH?!
-
AngelTailx2
commented
I see future scenarios in which a black streamer advocating for an end to police violence on stream who will be handed a warning and/or a suspension for not labeling their stream as “Politics” -- or a trans streamer calling for trans rights also potentially being warned and/or suspended for not labeling her streams as “Sensitive Social Issues” – while Twitch claims that it is for “a place for people to express themselves and discuss the world around them”, under the deceitful banner of "child and community safety".
The irony, hypocrisy and lack of empathy is real.
The entirety of Article VII should be removed, as it would open the floodgates for repression of the right to expression, as expressed in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights -
phiasch
commented
For a company who used to talk big about pride and even has global pride emotes, this move is baffling. This change implies use of pride emotes, which are available globally on your platform, could constitute "sensitive social issues" if discussed in an amount of detail.
Even with a current onslaught of vitriolic hate which causes tolerance to appear controversial, submitting to the present intolerance is morally bankrupt. Any policy which causes people, by their very existence, to be deemed controversial and necessary of additional moderation causes additional marginalization to those already marginalized and oppression to those already oppressed.
Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
- Karl Popper -
LionsPrideStudios
commented
I'm sorry, maybe it's not the Star of David, but making us label our streams as 'sensitive topics' just for existing outside heteronormative lifestyles? When did I step into my own novel? And as George Carlin said, if you want to know what a moronic word 'lifestyle' is, just remember: technically, Attila the Hun had an active outdoor lifestyle.
-
toats_notwolfie
commented
My gender and orientation are not political views!!!
-
Penny_the_Goblin
commented
All this is gonna do is let bigots start flagging queer creators on Twitch willy-nilly, just for even mentioning their identity. You already let them spout their bigoted nonsense (cough Asmon) without ever doing anything about it, and now you're letting them get the foot in the door to start reporting us for existing? You know darn well that's what's gonna happen. Don't let it happen.
-
kdynce
commented
My existence is not a sensitive social issue, I simply want to live without being discriminated against.
-
Rabid_Hound
commented
My existence is NOT a "sensitive issue" this is beyond ridiculous to tell minorities to do
-
ellerellie
commented
The existence of LGBTQ+ people should not be political. Silencing people who just want their civil liberties is objectively stupid and immoral
-
OccultEyes
commented
So now you have to wear a special "mark" if you belong to certain minorities and want to stream, because your very existence has been deemed political.
Sane..
-
TheTraiven
commented
My existence is not a "sensitive" issue
-
nika_hoshinova
commented
Silencing women, LGBTQ people and immigrants isn't cool
-
tickyhead
commented
Absolutely asinine decision, and one that will turn away a vast number of streamers and users alike. I can think of multiple streamers (myself included) who would automatically no longer be able to use this platform simply by way of our existence. I can think of many others who would leave in solidarity.
Calling discussion of and visibility for LGBTQ+, immigrant, and reproductive rights a "sensitive issue" sides with the oppressor and silences the victims. Reprehensible.
-
TheApril000
commented
My existence is not a "Sensitive Social Issue".
My neighbours' arrival in Australia is not a "Sensitive Social Issue".
My sisters' rights to make personal medical decisions for themselves is not a "Sensitive Social Issue".These are not "Sensitive Social Issues", rather these are things that a group of individuals want to get rid of and suppress any positive discussion about because they want to force their conservative and nationalist views on everyone.
-
KodaCat9
commented
This angers me beyond belief. I started streaming as something my son (who is now 18) and I could do together to bond. Now just mentioning about he or I can get us banned?! We do not talk about politics in our streams and to have our my identity and his orientation considered political is offensive on more levels than I can count. I try to encourage people to be open and have a safe environment but how can I when our channel has to have such a tag.
-
Minoscereb
commented
The very fact that people exist should not be considered a sensitive political issue. This whole idea reeks of kowtowing to reactionary forces out of fear.
-
meltyKitt
commented
i am so tired and streaming is one of the few things that helps me chill out and you're literally making me tired with this. i am simply trying to chill. you're lucky i can't cuss on here.
-
Sylvia_Pink
commented
Twitch staff does not have the time nor the ability to consistently and accurately draw the line on what qualifies as "Intermittent mentions" of gender and LGBTQ+ issues.
The current Content Classification Guidelines will result in a poor experience for creators and users alike.
-
izara_everdusk
commented
Please change this! We're just existing!
-
kameradsage
commented
We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.