Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
lsae9
commented
I agree, this is unacceptable.
-
autumnwitch93
commented
My human rights are not "sensitive topics."
-
taromilkVT
commented
The fact they can’t see how this will blatantly be used against minorities by the hateful parties who call us “politics” for existing is so tone deaf. Shame on you twitch.
-
SwiftrunnerXXY
commented
really, twitch? Are you so hard up for racist bigot money that you'd throw entire massive swathes of people under the bus for it? Remove this clause.
-
AuroVee
commented
What would count as "the focus of the stream"? Although note that it only refers to *legalisation related to said 'issues'*, and I don't think it's a "explicit content" warning that needs to be applied. Still, I have to agree that calling it the way they have is one thing that does need changing if they do keep it in some form.
-
leoweooo
commented
this is absolutely ridiculous lmao. "Discussing ideological or socio-political views on topics like gender, race, sexuality, or religion" this isn't just furthering bigotry against queer and trans people, but preventing people from discussing their own religions, and antifeminist to boot. can a woman no longer talk about misogyny? can a black streamer no longer talk about their experiences with being black? preventing people from merely talking about their own lives is incredibly backwards and cruel.
-
SlackerEmeritus
commented
The US Presidential election, a new bill presented on the Senate floor, the ideological drift of both parties, international relations = political, not explicit.
Obscene editorial comic expressing a derogatory opinion of a political figure = political and explicit.
This game features graphic gore and nudity = explicit, not political.
Hey, I'm queer and a gamer = neither political nor explicit.
This isn't that difficult a concept to grasp. Queer folks aren't a sensitive or explicit topic just for existing; if whoever wrote that clause thinks they are, that is the writer's fault and they should address that privately, not by trying to enact discriminatory policy.
-
scotteiplays
commented
I am so sick of my existence getting labeled political
-
Draconi_ch
commented
Nah y'all gotta get rid of this. Treating LGBTQ+ topics like a "sensitive social issue" when in fact, it's just human rights is flat out disgusting. This clause has to be removed. Twitch was supposed to be this inclusive place where we can talk about ourselves— BE ourselves. Now, it feels like with these changes, you're attempting to pander to the lowest common denominator, silence voices advocating for these same human rights, and suppress talking about the change.
Why is it that THIS is what Twitch is going for instead of getting rid of the more egregious offenders on the site?
-
mossyfroggie
commented
a queer person talking about their life isnt a "sensitive issue".
-
annanomaly
commented
This is a blatantly oppressive and discriminatory policy. You will lose a massive section of your userbase if you actually try to enforce this policy.
-
sorecerernathan
commented
LGBT+ voices have a right to stream on Twitch without having to use the "politics" tag. This rule is stupid.
-
R3dpanda10rd
commented
Deciding that the existence of queer and 2SLGBTQIA+ people is “political” is one of the coldest, most inhuman concepts I have ever heard of, and it is deeply unacceptable if twitch goes forward with this xenophobic policy change. Fix your ****
-
Its_Classified__
commented
LGBTQ+ issues are not sensitive issues. This is about people's life and rights being on the line. Shame on you for bowing to bigotry.
-
LilyGoatDemon
commented
My existence is not a "sensitive social issue". I am here. I am queer. Y'all need to get used to it, not suppress us for existing.
-
fuka_petals
commented
LGBTQIA+ isn't a "sensitive topic" and our existence isn't a political matter. Censoring queer voices will only lead to more violence and discrimination presented against queer lives
-
Temlly
commented
I live in a pretty intolerant environment.
Can't wear those clothes that I want to or show affection to some people in public. Can't posses any LGBTQ+ symbolics. Can't legally transition. Can't even talk about all of that irl or my local internet aside from talking to the close people I trust.
That includes any media I'm using. Can't put an LGBTQ+ tag or add a related charity on stream.
These things above can lead me to having problems with the law. (It's heavier when includes media broadcasting).Before that was inforced by law in this place - most of the people here were "tolerable" to minorities. You still could be in danger on streets or elsewhere but only if You've encountered the vicious ones.
...But then the government decided to call it "political" and it became nation-vide. That was the call.
-
Umbramons
commented
Treating LGBTQ+ people and LGBTQ+ topics as a sensitive social and political issue is stigmatizing and discriminating and only makes things worse for us, remove this!
-
acewulfric
commented
Someone's existence is not a sensitive social issue. LGBT+ people are human beings and deserve to exist. By marking LGBT+ topics as "sensitive" you are furthering homophobia and transphobia. LGBT+ streamers deserve to be comfortable enough to discuss their own lives naturally without risk of labeling their content with a marker implying their existence is sensitive materials to others.
As someone apart of the LGBTQ+ community, I’m sorry but that rule is stupid. You’re going to lose so many people who use your services because of this and it’ll be ya’ll’s faults.
-
MatchaIsSpent
commented
Even if they remove it, the damage is already done, and the little trust left is no more.