Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
BubblesAlmighty
commented
as someone who will be starting HRT next year the very idea that i could be labeled as a SENSITIVE SOCIAL ISSUE because i wanted to talk about work and i happen to be trans is horrendously insulting. This will lead to increased harassment to members of the LGBTQ+ community and will just be another bullet point of support for people who hate me just because I have the audacity to be alive.
-
sorcanna
commented
Yea this is a bad look. Given that it basically asks that if you are part of a group being attacked for existing then please tag yourself for easy identification. I seem to remember learning about something similar in history class when I was a kid.
-
GwenBunnyGaming
commented
By the new rules, me talking about my gender journey, discussing nothing about my sexuality or any form of sexual content, could easily be flagged by these guidelines. Everything I would say on the matter would be things I could say at my office job without getting any backlash, so why does it need to be flagged on the same level as discussing a war?
Answer: It doesn't.
-
grunkzone
commented
twitch why in the world did you think something like this was a good idea, did you not expect pushback?
-
ooediacarov
commented
The politisizing of the LGBTQ+ community does nothing, but harm. People should not be treated as mere ideoligy
-
alidonis12
commented
Our right to exist is not politics. It's a **** right. Any less is discrimination. It should not be controversial. We will not be silenced by your short-sighted ways!
-
Criftshift
commented
I'm not really part of this community but frick that policy ********
-
CinnaMarnie
commented
The right for LGBTQIA folks to exist is not political, Love is love, if you do not like a streamer for any reason such as this, it is the duty of the viewer to stop watching, not twitch to marginalise communities that are oppressed!
-
adzofuniverse6
commented
As a gender-fluid person and a femboy who would love to start streaming on twitch at some point, I hope this gets fixed!
-
newgraywolf2
commented
I don't think I can say anything that hasn't already been said. So I will simply say that I agree with everything everyone else is saying. This way of doing things will lead to increased harassment.
-
AshtenThePlatypus
commented
How did this get through whatever process twitch has for approving new rules without anyone question it. It's literal discrimination against LGBTQ+ people like myself. I should NOT be swept away simply existing!
-
PrincessKate3125
commented
My right to exist is not political.
-
MagicMoki
commented
Hear hear!
-
Hynth
commented
The existence of LGBTQIA+ people is fact, not a politically sensitive issue. Forcing queer people to mark their stream (or force marking it for them if mass reported) enables hate and may very well make streaming a security issue for them.
Do the people creating these documents not know their world war 2 history and what happened when Jews were forced to mark themselves?
-
toasty_corner
commented
Marginalized people's lives are not a "sensitive social issue." We deserve to be seen and represented and to express who we are and our struggles.
-
salmon_elle
commented
gay rights! trans rights! ect. :3
-
AnotherCatgirlProgrammer
commented
As not passing trans woman, am I allowed to openly say I prefer female pronouns or is it already too far?
-
ignismare2
commented
Equivalent to putting a star of David on Jewish people in Nazi Germany. Disgraceful. Remove it immediately.
-
LvnaUwU
commented
We are not a controversial topic twitch! Everyone who thinks that LGBTQ+ People are something bad don't know how the world works. As a Trans Woman I really hope you do the only right thing and Remove it.
-
AriLep
commented
People simply existing as they are with no choice in how they are either born or develop is not a political topic, and cannot be reasonably be compared to wars, genocide, or military conflicts. There's no way a collection of minds got together and thought this through, and anyone involved in this decision shouldn't have such power.