Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
SunsetTheHybridKitsune
commented
This is extremely unfair and stupid, it shouldn’t even be necessary! People should be allowed to be who they are so go ******* remove this from your guidelines!!
-
frogfairy6
commented
I'm a nonbinary person, are you going to flag my entire channel just because I exist? This policy is damaging and insensitive. My life isn't a political debate point.
-
chalky_warrior
commented
my gosh-darn existence ain't political. i am who i am, simple as. the people i like and the gender i identify as aren't political, They're Just Me.
-
tatersalid07
commented
Twitch this is a wildly stupid move. I frequently try to steer conversations away from topics like war, intense political debate or other topics which create hatred and conflict but this is directly targeting a portion of your streamers, viewers and I guarentee staff as well. This is outright disgusting. I for one will not be utilizing your platform until this changes so either change it fast or watch a not insignifigant portion of your userbase slip away. Some people would have to be flagged just for existing with how this is written and you remember a large event where people got flagged just because of who they are? Maybe you should think about the similarities and go ******* fix this.
-
IstheSeaSilent
commented
Queer people’s existence is not a “sensitive social issue.”
-
mrbuck832
commented
This clause is just... Absolutely idiotic.
I'm less than straight, so if I got a boyfriend and was gushing about him or I turned out to be trans and just talked about it, I'd be penalized. I don't use Twitch anymore, but letting this slide would be setting a precident for other companies.
-
skelelaura
commented
This is absolute nonsense. I never would have thought queer censorship would reach platforms that are widely used in the queer community. This is disgraceful and makes me so depressed.
-
FaineAndZu
commented
On one hand, twitch wants to put labels on LGBTQ+ people for existing which is just another step into ostracizing us and validating the bigots "they're not normal we shouldn't ever have to see you". This will also cause many people to not join LBGTQ+ streams because of the "sensitive subject label" and hurt LGBTQ+ creators immensely as we cannot speak out on subjects affecting us without being penalized. On the other hand twitch openly allows people like Asmongold to call us "mentally ill weirdos... who is run by MAPs (pedophiles)" which is not only false but he isn't banned when he repeatedly says these things
-
trixiemolotova
commented
This rule will drive LGBTQ content from Twitch, and if that happens, what's even left to watch? I'll go to Any other platform where it can be streamed.
-
LobAutumny
commented
Man, Twitch really just doesn't have a single queer consultant on their staff, do they?
-
DazHoss
commented
Are you kidding me with this ****? This requirement belongs in the trash.
-
MiniHood1997
commented
Requiring people who are LGBTQ+ to put a warning label up whenever they discuss "sensitive issues" functions the same as requiring them to put a warning label just for being LGBTQ+.
A straight person can mention their spouse, but a gay person cannot because that's "controversial".Requiring this would also contravene the UK Equality Act 2010, as it discriminates against the protected characteristics of sexuality and gender reassignment, since, again, a cis-het person can discuss their relationships or gender without requiring a label, but LGBTQ+ people cannot.
-
Fantasy_Fenix
commented
The fact that both me and my partner could be flagged/hidden/removed/targeted just for talking to each other on stream in an affectionate way makes me sick to my stomach.
Our existence is not political. Our lives are not up for debate.
Twitch has been absolutely disgusting lately, and this is just one more nail in the coffin. -
kinsystem_yt
commented
Sure it may have the potential to aid against people who choose to be ignorant and spew their ideals, there are far too many negatives for lgbtq+ people. It is who we are and we are known to not take kindly to being silenced and this event is no different.
-
terrorfecta
commented
This is an absurd take by Twitch. All this will do is allow people to weaponize the guidelines against marginalized (or those who are perceived as marginalized) streamers and further reduce the safety of users.
-
Vanilla_Wayfarer
commented
The matter of whether peoples identies are valid and worthy of protection is not a "sensitive issue" it is a basic human right and you have no power to regulate that. If you have any integrity whatsoever you will not only walk this asinine decision back but also reevaluate your role in manipulating media on your platform. I can no longer financially support a platform that denies people even the most basic of human dignities.
Sincerely,
- a former prime member -
Searous
commented
For the safety, security and comfortability of myself and others, this should be removed immediately. My existence is not and never will be political in any way whatsoever.
-
Aelithron
commented
Existing as a queer person shouldn’t be considered political, but this policy treats it like it is.
-
Endrarah
commented
Banning these topics only help bigots and helping bigotry is not a good look
-
Rornir13
commented
Existence isn't political, stop appeasing Bigots.
Not being a Straight White Man shouldn't have your existence marked political.