Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
XaeschelVT
commented
Twitch trying to equate LGBTQ+ rights, immigrants, and reproductive rights to literal War is the most diabolically unhinged take I've heard in a hot minute.
-
Jesuswasmexican
commented
I believe that the politicizing of people's rights and liberties is a net negative towards society, and the "sensitive social issues" clause only furthers this. Other peoples lives ought not to be considered a "sensitive social issue."
Putting a large community of people like the LGBTQ+ community behind a censor bar- no doubt losing the streamer and Twitch substantial amount of ad revenue in the process- would only lead to twitch and it's users losing money. No advertiser wants what they're selling to be next to something sensitive, after all.
As a user and as a queer person, I demand that Article VII be heavily reworked to not discriminate against certain minority groups, or be scrapped entirely.
-
BranBirb
commented
when even the existence of a person is political this bans people from streaming in general. This really should be removed!
-
y2krankor
commented
I can't even begin to describe what a load of wanking bollocks this is. Twitch should be ashamed of themselves for bowing to pressure from a small, vocal group of hate-mongers.
-
HighCharityy
commented
we literally just want to live and be ourselves and be left alone
-
GalacticTurnip
commented
This is seriously *********.
-
thedantelu
commented
This kind of classification label hurts so many marginalized communities that are already hurting by being dragged through politics. Our lives, bodies, journeys, etc are not a political topic. Im a transman who streams horrorgames with variety but im also trying to be a trans advocate and talk about my journey when asked. I cant stop being trans. I have rules to not talk about politics in my streams. Being LGBTQ+ or in any of the marginalized communities is not political or a sensitive social issues and this is just a huge excuse for bigoted people to discriminate and hate.
-
knockedout26
commented
Our existence is not political! LGBTQ+ people are PEOPLE who exist separately from policies and debates. We aren’t a “sensitive issue” that needs to be censored just by the nature of existing in a given space. Not cool, Twitch.
-
DerNephren
commented
Why can't we just exist holy f
-
meander1995
commented
I'm in full agreement of this as a trans lesbian. Trans people, gay people, lesbians, bisexuals, pansexuals, asexuals, etc should not have their existence be inherently political.
-
SquireTilde
commented
For christs sake, we just want to exist
-
hungriestclone
commented
Queer rights are human rights. To remove them from a public space is bigotry.
-
eva0093
commented
LGBT erasure is a real thing being pushed for and it ends up hurting everyone in the long run. My existence is not political other people trying to make me unseen and silent is.
-
4Rory
commented
I agree with the sentiment, but (particularly with the intermittent mention clause explicit) I think it will depend on enforcement- if it is used to bonk bigots on the platform I am 100% in favor of the clauses as they stand.
Further, I think it's short sighted to single out LGBTQ creators existence as particular import when people of color, women, and immigrants should have every bit as much protection for their existence and ability to discuss issues affecting them. Youtube is notorious for flagging LGBTQ content, Twitch is not, and honestly has a bit of a racist/sexist problem. I would further extend the same protection to those who are affected by foreign policy decisions. They should be allowed to exist and voice issues affecting them. I would be in favor of striking all of the bottom three bullets from Article VII, but as previously stated, am also waiting to see how it is enforced before making judgement.
-
marideerie
commented
Would like to continue talking about my wife on stream without it being considered "explicit".
-
aodh_gift
commented
Queer existence is not a threat
-
HawkeBM
commented
I agree that it should be removed. I feel like it's not fair to the LGBTQ+ community who just wants to do what they love on the platform.
-
LysVelvet
commented
Variation in the human experience is not an inherently political issue. Yet, it is made into one against our will. This is not proper, and this is not okay. Queer people are just people, and should never be regarded as a topic of debate or politicised. To do so is not only incorrect, it is dangerous.
-
ladyeightx
commented
Twitch should drop the "sensitive social issues" tag for topics like LGBTQ+ lives, immigrant rights, and reproductive rights in its guidelines. These aren’t controversial or “sensitive” issues—they’re human rights. Labeling discussions about people’s basic identities or rights as explicit or delicate just sends a message that their existence is something risky or inappropriate, which is completely unfair.
This kind of policy only fuels negative stereotypes, especially making LGBTQ+ topics seem like they’re inherently “deviant” or “off-limits.” People should be able to talk about who they are without feeling like they’re being censored or stigmatized. By removing this label, Twitch can take a big step toward creating a genuinely inclusive space where everyone feels respected and able to share their lives without judgment.
-
thedantelu
commented
This kind of classification label hurts so many marginalized communities that are already hurting by being dragged through politics. Our lives, bodies, journeys, etc are not a political topic. Im a transman who streams horrorgames with variety but im also trying to be a trans advocate and talk about my journey when asked. I cant stop being trans. I have rules to not talk about politics in my streams. Being LGBTQ+ or in any of the marginalized communities is not political or a sensitive social issues and this is just a huge excuse for bigoted people to discriminate and hate.