Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
TheKookyCeltic
commented
Utterly revolting to think they can get away with harming LGBTQ+ individuals… Let’s prove ‘em wrong.
-
deaga101
commented
We are just people, not "sensitive social issues"
-
QueenofHaunts
commented
My life and transness aren't a sensitive social issue. My existence isn't political, it just is. And this would majorly negatively affect multiple groups of protected marginalized peoples on this platform.
-
keyblademermaiden
commented
LGBTQ+ people are not a sensitive topic. We're just people.
-
Pielove123clan
commented
LGBTQ+ individuals shouldn't be counted as a sensitive topic to censor.
-
snepderg
commented
I am not a sensitive social issue.
-
grimmwitcher
commented
It comes down to nothing more than casual abuse. To aggressively suggest that ‘*those* types’ of human being (because diving people up into more and less desirable types doesn’t scream HEIL) not be allowed to be mentioned in conversation because *those types* of people are too ‘sensitive’ a topic highlights a particularly depraved perversion in the suggester. The only people ‘sensitive’ to lgbt people and migrants existing and minding their own business’ are career homophobes and xenophobes whose ideals pinnacle around violent, criminal behaviour towards those people. While I don’t doubt twitch would happily indirectly incite violence against minorities for revenue, there may be a time to consider; slapping this Jude star onto streams where the streamer isn’t a straight white man puts a prime target onto that stream and streamer to be the victim of coordinated, targeted abuse and harassment. It will not be used to shield the poor, poor bigots, it will be weaponised against casual but daily users, like myself. I wonder if twitch stands to make enough revenue from the handful of neo-Nazi’s it stands to stroke off, to ballast out the exodus of users who had the audacity to be born black, or poor, or gay, and not hide it well enough to avoid the site-encouraged persecution?
-
SerariInari
commented
My existence is not political. I deserve to have a voice.
-
Dicotiledon
commented
This feels incredibly hard to enforce, like what arethe limits to consider something "sensitive?" Is a trans streamer talking about their life sensitive? Is it someone talking about their struggles? Just being lgbt in itself? This is the first slope to a pipeline into becoming more intolerant to a group that is already censored enough.
-
matthew100001
commented
Content supportive of such issues: sensitive
content that wants to see such be restricted: A-OK.Might as well close my account at this point.
-
beepboop2299
commented
Existing is not political.
This new "rule" is disgusting and will only endanger already endangered people, flagging their streams as places to be attacked.
Do you not see the similarity between this and making the Jewish people wear stars of David.
This is inexcusable and cannot be allowed. -
laceladybug
commented
this is ridiculous and should not be implemented
-
lexzahara
commented
Queer existence is only a sensitive political issue if you value the comfort of bigots over the lives of queer people. This is a disgusting, discriminating policy masquerading as moderation
-
bobthebigbox
commented
So let me get this straight, because there are people out there who think it's okay to dehumanise me and people like me, we are suddenly a "sensitive social issue"?!
This policy is disgusting, if we don't tag ourself, the people who would love to ruin our lives, will get ammunition they can use against us.
And tagging ourself seems even worse, it makes it much easier for those kinds of people to find us.
-
whale_faller
commented
what? how am I a sensitive topic
-
DadBearVic
commented
Forcing queer people to tag their streams as sensitive only brings more violence to our community and tells the people literally killing us that they are allowed to do that. How can y'all allow literal groomers, pedophiles, and bigots have this platform when people who are literally just existing are targeted and politicized by your ********?
-
bedlamwolf
commented
That's like saying civil rights in general are sensitive issues. The moment you start doing this? You start to dehumanize people.
-
Skaether
commented
how am i a "sensitive social issue" im just alive
-
meisterduct
commented
This is absolutely deplorable. I cannot believe this is even up for debate. Queer folks are not a political issue.
-
Elessar_Isildurheir
commented
my rights are not a "censitive topic" you corporate ********