Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
mycabbagesenpai
commented
Not only is my existence not a political issue, this is also a "foot in the door" tactic that leads to worse discrimination through proper and legal channels. By putting up a flag for if someone is discussing "sensitive topics", it opens the door to more forms of exclusion, censoring, and banning of marginalized communities.
-
jeuuro
commented
It's not a sensitive issues, it's just a topic like any other topic.
-
Karthara
commented
Me simply existing is not a 'sensitive social issue'.
-
illiria_ow
commented
My existence shouldn't be political.
-
RandomRedViking
commented
Discrimination at its finest. You are putting targets on streamers with this, Shame on you Twitch
-
1withthe4ce
commented
I'm fully willing to unsubscribe from the folks I follow over this. I won't give money to a company that won't let them be themselves or talk about their lives. Money where my mouth is!
-
bonnie_blue_
commented
my existence is not a 'social issue'
-
Yarro567
commented
I'm not a sensitive social issue. I'm a human being. I watch streams, go to the store, and just want to live my life.
-
grooveis4life
commented
People's identity is not political.
-
itsrhodi
commented
My identity is not political. Shame on Twitch
-
thistlemace
commented
As someone commented below, censoring someone's identity means you're censoring their right to exist. Our queerness, our right to bodily autonomy, and our ability to move throughout the world should never be labeled as "sensitive social issues," they should be treated as the completely normal things that they are. We shouldn't be punished for other people's ill behaviour.
-
ebby172
commented
Queer people existing is not a "social issue"
-
kranethios
commented
Yeah, not fond of the idea that acknowledging that LGBTQ+ people exist constitutes a "sensitive social issue." We're just people trying to live our lives and we deal with a lot of othering already. Same with immigrants and racial minorities. Maybe outward bigotry against these demographics is what should be treated as a "sensitive social issue."
-
cantbantheduck
commented
as a transwoman this is disgusting and pandering to a small minority who seeks to make our existence a sensitive social issue
-
WineHuman
commented
When you are a marginalized person your existence is not political, it is politicized. Your access to healthcare and your identity should not be a content warning ever. We should not have to think about how to categorize our existence or how to file our stream because we live in the context of a world that does not always want to grant us equal rights and freedoms. Please don't play into a problematic narrative that lends itself to further marginalizing the marginalized.
-
jambleese
commented
I understand the idea behind this feature, but the collateral damage is simply too severe. Especially when a significant number of Streamers are directly impacted by these issues. Querler streamers, in particular, would effectively need this warning on every time they stream.
-
Gloryofdawn
commented
If "Sensitive Social Issues" ever involves the identity of a person, you are censoring that person's right to exist. You wouldn't censor someone discussing their identity as American or Chinese or French; why would you censor someone discussing their identity as a queer person?
-
r0se3vlyn
commented
My existence isn't political. If you want to avoid controversy, twitch, stop being anti-LGBTQIA+ and anti-vtuber.
-
eddie444444444444444444
commented
queerness doesn't deserve to be censored or set as sensitive subject! don't validate bigots over queer folks!
-
SilverAlethia
commented
Hi, my existence being political isn't my fault! if you want to dodge controversy, you're better off booting off people who express bigotry on your platform than telling marginalized people to be quiet! this decision as it currently stands is nothing short of an act of cowardice and capitulating to the whining of sad little men and fascists.