Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
AnnInWonderland
commented
You can do better, Twitch.
-
TiniestTinsel
commented
This bullet point would only be another step towards this weird sanitizing process of the internet. It has been, and could still be, a place of wonder where people from all around the world, all manner of identities, can come together. If you come across something/someone you don't agree with, it's *so easy* to just... not interact with it/them. We do not need online platforms to 'protect' us from something some other people decided might be disagreeing with our own standpoint. If you can have a Twitch account, you should be able to think for your own **** self and have the brains to say to yourself "hey, this creator is talking about stuff I don't like/agree with/want to listen to, so instead of blaming them for their experiences and beliefs, I'll just watch something else". Stop trying to censor people in a misguided attempt to 'protect' others.
-
Bliither
commented
So instead of dealing with terminally online snowflakes that can't fathom the fact that other peoples lives are none of their fricking business and can't help themselves from harassing others, which is illegal in multiple countries you make business in by the way... You decided the force people to either ignore their existence or out themselves... Peoples lives and existence aren't political... Grow a spine
-
myrdesky
commented
Our existence isn't "sensitive", we are human
-
Hjalfnar_HistoryGaming
commented
Yeah my wife is bi so...me not being able to talk about my partner is pretty *********.
-
nikolaitheratguy
commented
Yet another instance of me just being myself (trans) is labeled as "political", yippe. What even are "sensitive" topics at this point, I remember "sensitive issues" were things related to mental health, topics that might be triggering to those who've had experience with the things being discussed. Apparently now among topics that can be found "triggering" is people wanting to be treated like people. Got it.
-
Wazkalia
commented
It starts with LGBT people then starts slipping to race and I refuse to let that happen. Imagine, a bunch of creators, content, and money leaving because them existing is 'sensitive'.
-
musicalmikachu
commented
How dare you. How dare you. How dare you. How dare you. How dare you. I'm so tired of the pursuit of profit being put above the lives of those most marginalized. I'm so sick and tired of bigotry and hatred being profitable enough to cater towards. Human rights are not up for debate. These corporations have no morality. Twitch is disgusting for even insinuating this.
-
thedulcineaeffect
commented
Really disgusting how you're willing to label someone's entire existence as a "sensitive political issue" when you're more than willing to overlook people slinging slurs, encouraging doxxing and stalking, and spreading other hateful rhetoric. You are literally encouraging the first step towards eugenics and genocide of "undesirables". Please don't do this.
-
RandomNopeGenerator
commented
our existence is not a sensitive social issue unless you've never gone anywhere beyond your backyard
-
silky_selkie
commented
You have an entire community telling you the problems here. Please listen
-
Owtbound
commented
Trans rights are human rights!
-
ggmeowgicat
commented
Brilliant stuff. Forcing marginalized people to out themselves? Catering to the terminally online who've never interacted with women and queer people? Kick rocks. Absolutely not.
Our existence and rights are not up for discussion. We fight every single day to make space for ourselves, and against the brain rot that leads to shameful decision-making like this. Imagine if ANY other legitimate platform of this size even suggested something along these lines.
Reevaluate yourselves, Twitch.
-
d3ltuhhh
commented
if my existence as a bisexual, nonbinary, polyamorous individual on twitch is going to be considered a "sensitive social issue" on par with literal wars going on across the world right now then i am very glad i cancelled my subs.
trans rights are human rights. nothing political or sensitive about it.
-
YvannaIrie
commented
So trans people are a "sensitive social issue" but lolcow streams stealing content from creators or harassing random POC are not.
I'm sorry, but as someone who mostly comes to Twitch for gaming content and has to deal with the front page recs being always full of vile idiocy, I don't think shutting up queer people and immigrants trying to talk about their own lives is the solution to getting rid of it.
If Twitch wants an apolitical platform, they can start with denying bigots the right to be bigoted on their platform first.
-
Lyrelia
commented
Not okay, Twitch. You are confusing sensitive issues with people being sensitive about another's existence or medical needs. This label is going to act as a dog whistle for bigots to harass creators who are already dealing with being demonized by racist, sexist, prejudiced bigots. It makes as much sense as requiring Black, femme-presenting, and disabled (basically anyone not a white heteronormative Christian male) creators to be labeled as a sensitive issue. You are catering to a garbage take, and I hope that the backlash from reasonable and decent people is as swift as it should be.
-
snoozy_is_live
commented
the idea that twitch counts lgbtq conversations as "social issues" shows how they really view queer people and how them literally just existing is threatening to them :/
-
kokari18
commented
My existence is not a "political issue." Labeling it as such is dangerous and does harm in so many ways.
-
blackjack_ind
commented
The new list of "controversial" things shows a damning lack of awareness by Twitch. You go out of you way to put things such as being LGBT, an immigrant and talking about fundamental things such as reproductive rights and the right to exist as we are in the same breath as actual tragedies like war, along with calling aforementioned things "ideologies". That is disingenuous, harmful to literally everyone and shows an absolute failure of Twitch management to understand their audience. Remove the bullet points for reproductive issues, LGBTQ+ people and immigrants. Those aren't "sensitive political issues", they are simply regular human beings wanting to exist as their best selves.
-
Domino_Matrix
commented
People should be able to talk about their experiences as part of the LGBT+ community without being labelled as 'political'. Existing is not political.