Remove "sensitive social issues" bullet point.
Twitch should remove the "sensitive social issues" clause from Article VII of its Content Classification Guidelines. LGBTQ+ people, immigrants, and reproductive rights are NOT "sensitive social issues", they are common sense issues, where one side simply wants their liberties intact. The controversy is entirely on the other side of the argument the involves taking those liberties away.
Especially as it pertains to LGBTQ+ individuals, the notion that the discussion of their very existence is political is absolute nonsense. These people should be allowed to discuss the issues affecting them without being set behind some kind of "explicit content" label. This is a slippery slope that begins with people automatically labeling non-heteronormative lives and content as "deviant" or "degenerate", especially by grossly bad actors who want to be edgy.
Remove the final bullet point from Article VII.
Thank you for raising this. We’ve just posted a Tweet addressing these concerns.
You don’t need to label your stream with the new Politics & Sensitive Social Issues CCL if you are sharing your lived experience. Intermittent mentions of politics, politicians, or sensitive social issues also do not require the Politics and Sensitive Social Issues label. We apologize for not communicating this well initially.
If you are an LGBTQ+ streamer, for example, you do not need this label when talking about your lived experience as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. We’ve added clarifying language to the Content Classification Guidelines to better express this.
-
neddison_
commented
These are not sensitive issues. These are demographics of people that exist, and have a right to do so without the politicising of their identities — what a disappointing cave-in to hateful politics.
Maybe twitch can’t see the dehumanisation and harm these terms will bring to effect, but twitch can expect to see the loss of revenue and engagement from these communities as they leave a platform that censors even the mention of their existence. Let’s hope at least one of these factors matters to twitch.
-
hopefrayorl
commented
Straight up discrimination. The LGBTQ population have been here saince the dawn of time. Our existence and experiances are not contraversial (except in the discrimination we constantly face)
Being trans is a facet of my life, as is being a lesbian. I talk about that constantly. To put me talking about my transition of my girlfriends on the same level as war and political protest is vile
-
glarpolblop
commented
Queer existence and queer people talking about our lives should not be forced to have a political label attached to us for talking about something relating to our queerness
-
jtyger
commented
Please remove this idea entirely, Your shutting down multiple types of speech, Trans folks, political tubers, and more. This is just down right phobic and in the poorest taste.
We all already know Besos is a coward because he owns the Post and tried to play up the middle on the endorsement, This is more of that.
Sorry bud you dont get to silence everyone and play centrist.
Your platforms need people and this is gonna give a whole lot of the smart ones a reason to build their own platform.
-
evenstev3
commented
As a trans person, if my existence in this space makes you so uncomfortable that you have to segregate me from everyone else, then you don't deserve to have me here. This is a direct attack on our right to exist where we choose and we are not going to stand for it.
-
MondoMoleNo3
commented
Our existence is not a debate! We're people, not an issue to be discussed or argued against, and we're not "explicit"
-
AsheMichi
commented
lets go lesbians and other lgbtq+ friends
-
twipenne
commented
LGBTQ+ people are not, have never been, and never will "sensitive social issues." The entire rule gives off vibes of a certain nationalist party from 1930s Germany
-
AbbyJamz
commented
I am transgender. I know from my own experiences that just existing and being available on stream to anyone freely has given some a window into the life of a trans person without the context and sometimes aggression seen on media and social networks. That experience was their true first positive experience with a trans person and had shifted their previous stances. I have doubt that if my stream were labeled with a political or social issue tag that we would've had such an opportunity. Sometimes growth and understanding comes from being outside of one's comfort zone. That's an important thing to remember. This policy will just continue to drive division.
-
Juniiibugg
commented
This is absolutely disappointing, especially days out from a US Presidential election.
-
CrazyFoxOni51
commented
im against this decision of suppressing the lgbtqia community. i'm disgusted that this is even a thing
-
DiceNAndy
commented
Being acquittances and even friends with a lot of LGBTQ+ content creators, I am signing this in support.
-
callmeanimu
commented
People's mere existence should not be political. They should be allowed to talk about themselves and experiences without facing consequences and should not need to be labeled. As a pan man I'm with my fellow LGBTQIA+ folks on this.
-
Hooded_Havoc
commented
The whole point of watching streamers is to hear them talk about what's on their mind and their lives. Literally just talking about being LGBTQ+ is no different than talking about having curly hair, or being from a specific country. It's not a political issue to exist.
-
AspenDracaena
commented
By keeping this bullet point, Twitch is only making it easier for people to make false reports on people who are just talking about their lives. Being LGBTQIA+ is not political. Neither is being a woman who needs reproductive health care. And immigrants are simply people. These are human rights issues... we all deserve to feel safe and have access to support. People aren't social issues. They're people. They should be able to feel safe talking about things that affect their daily lives.
I stand with my LGBTQIA+ family and friends. I stand with my fellow women who simply want reasonable health care so we can live. I stand with people like my grandfather, who was an immigrant. I also stand for my BIPOC friends and family who might fall under this guideline, as well as those who are disabled or have mental health diagnoses.
-
colorfulinkz
commented
Of course Twitch going with another sh!tty idea like the advertisement guideline they reversed.
-
Minx_the_Tiger
commented
I'm a bisexual Jewish Veteran woman who talks about mental health sometimes and encourages my viewers to seek mental and physical help if they need it because we don't all exist in a vacuum. My existence isn't political or "sensitive" at all, and I shouldn't be discriminated against like this.
-
KnackeredOcelot
commented
It is disgusting to label people as "sensitive social issues" just because they do not conform to the rigid definitions of bigots.
-
GwenAEther
commented
The thing is literally ANYTHING gender-queer/LGBT+ is "political" so as a queer person, when I tell personal anecdotes about my life, all of the sudden it's politics and has to be marked. If someone asks why my name is Gwen and my voice is so deep, that can very easily turn into an apolitical discussion of "You don't need to voice train to be valid." or "Why I specifically don't care to voice train atm." If I tell a story, it's going to be LGBT+ related, because I am LGBT+, it doesn't magically make my story political.
-
boecraft_
commented
For me, being trans is a small part of my day to day life. I wake up, go to work, go home and the fact that I'm trans doesn't cross my mind or come up in conversation all that often. I do not want to put a small fact of my life on blast to a platform that will have people harassing me for that small fact. This should not be a thing, this should not be an issue. The fact I'm trans is not controversial, other people make it controversial.