Settings and activity
67 results found
-
49 votes
TuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
16,627 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
209 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesTuuliKauri
shared this idea
·
-
77 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
79 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
938 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
7,980 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment TuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
304 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment TuuliKauri
commented
In addition:
REGARDING TERMINATION
The current Termination provision is as follows and states the only way to withdraw the Acceptance of the Sponsorship Portal Terms of Service is to terminate your Twitch account. I doubt this is intended, please adjust to allow a support ticket to be used to withdraw from the Sponsorship Portal.(As of April 5th 2025)
3. Term and Termination
Twitch reserves the right, without notice and in our sole discretion, to (a) terminate your right to use the Service and (b) to block or prevent your future access to, and use of, the Service. Your only remedy with respect to any dissatisfaction with (i) the Service, (ii) any term of these Portal Terms, (iii) any policy or practice of Twitch in operating the Service, or (iv) any content or information transmitted through the Service, is to terminate your account and to discontinue use of any and all parts of the Service.REGARDING OWNERSHIP
A substantial amount of streaming content is not exclusively owned by the streamer - for example, copyright-free Music used with credit, or game footage while playing, or royalty-free art assets. These materials may have their own limitations on use that are in conflict with this provision. Assets may only be licenced for use on a live stream and with appropriate credit attached, for example. If the streamer needs to provide this ownership transfer described in the Sponsorship Portal Terms to Twitch, how would that work with stream assets? What if the materials used don't allow this? This doesn't seem to be as-intended."Twitch owns and controls all right, title, and interest in and to the results and proceeds of such Services and Advertising Content in all media, throughout the world, in perpetuity."
Twitch doesnt actually own it if non-exclusive assets are used; and streamers are not in a position to provide this to Twitch for assets they dont own. Another reason that the Work For Hire and ownership clause is confusing in a streaming context. Please adjust or remove clause (ix).
TuuliKauri
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesTuuliKauri
shared this idea
·
-
12 votesTuuliKauri
shared this idea
·
-
29 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
48 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment TuuliKauri
commented
There's some comments asking why no VODs/clips WITH audio. The issue is that the audio license is ONLY for LIVE broadcasts. Allowing any sort of clip or video with audio would require a license that includes On-Demand delivery of that audio. Those licenses are more expensive. This is baked into copyright and music law.
Muted clips would be awesome.
I am also going to add a command to my channel to create local clips, so that chat can still "clip" favourite things that happen on my DJ streams. Then I can remove the copyrighted audio locally and upload to YouTube or my main channel. Thats a workaround though, it would be much better if the first-party tools allowed a consistent viewer experience to participate in the fun in their normal way - clicking the CLIP button!
TuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
217 votes
We are actively investigating APIs for the music catalog. It is a complex challenge that requires more scrutiny than our usual endpoints. We will have further information about the potential implementation and availability of these APIs at a later date. If you have a use case in mind, please include it in the comments below as this would be helpful for our development process.
An error occurred while saving the comment TuuliKauri
commented
Just popping in to poke this as something that's critical if the TRACKS instead of the (short list of) ARTISTS are going to remain the way to know if something is Restricted or not and the source of truth. DJs cannot be reasonably expected to review track-by-track without a database to programatically complete this check.
And also I agree with @wopiTV's comment that a CSV export would also be a good workable temporary solution.
And ALSO samples are a big headache - detecting a sample from a restricted track, inside of an allowed track, seems to be occuring (I've seen one example of this, and I'm sure it's occuring elsewhere too). This necessitates a quick turnaround for a review / appeal of restricted track detection. Honestly I'm not sure Audible Magic is the right vendor for this use case, as the current system seems to be slow and non-responsive on issues of false DMCA detection or false DMCA claimants. Ideally the whole management of Restricted Tracks is under review on what the workflows will be, and whether the tasks and timelines are reasonable expectations to be implemented by all the parties. The whole DJ Program relies on the Restricted Tracks piece being workable (or ditched? hey there's an idea...).
Thanks Twitch for breaking ice through new territories.
TuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesTuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesTuuliKauri
shared this idea
·
-
33 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment TuuliKauri
commented
Agree.
A workaround before a programmed solution was available could be to allow a trailer to be added via a support ticket. As the Restricted Artists List could change at any time, DJs could have to sign off that they fully own the rights to any music and samples used in the trailer. Or Twitch could prohibit music entirely in the trailer videos (but that strikes me as unhelpful for DJs....)
https://dashboard.twitch.tv/settings/channel/channel-trailer-setup on my DJ Program account says "Select a video to get started. Need to upload something new? Go to Video Producer.
From your library: Only Uploads under 60 seconds may be selected. No videos found."I am considering making a trailer and once it's ready leaving the DJ Program; setting up my trailer since the ability to upload would be re-enabled; then re-joining the DJ Program. Hopefully that's a short-term workaround with no consequences for my account (and hopefully the trailer VOD wouldnt be deleted when re-joining the DJ program...)
TuuliKauri
supported this idea
·
Twitch is about people and building deep community. That is the differentiator Twitch has over other platforms. The moderation tools, the communities that have been built here, the way that Twitch (doesn't) handles scrolling through stream feeds, everything about Twitch supports humans and human interaction. Dan Clancy has a clear vision about this that he communicates regularly.
In that context it makes no sense to replace humans with AI slop. You are undermining your brand. You are undermining your value proposition. You are driving people away from your platform. You cannot afford NOT TO use real art.
The community notices. Chat notices. Your artists notice. It is antithetical to everything that makes Twitch great to use AI Generated art. There is no justification for it; it's not like real art is outside the budget.
I am so disappointed this is popping up again after all the CatInTheChat controversy.
Please implement a company-wide asset and branding policy that includes AI Art clauses as well as accessibility in images. Your brand will not survive without it. We want Twitch to thrive. It's our home.