Settings and activity
23 results found
-
25 votes
Thank you for your detailed submission and articulating the usefulness of the badge for game developers. We agree with the sentiment and additional context can be found in the deprecation announcement. You are correct that there was an increase in requests to verify organizations. This process is also used to gain access to other features such as Drops campaigns and game analytics. Product updates to limit requests for a global badge and remove confusion, such as enabling the badge only on a matching category as you mention, will take considerable time while continuing to block new developers from using these organization features. This change will reestablish the 1-week SLA for organization requests and an improved implementation of the game developer badge can be considered in the future while we enable new game developers to onboard.
An error occurred while saving the comment -
78 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment @itsjusttriz I've flagged this to be discussed soon so we can add a status for you and the other developers who have given this an upvote.
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Thanks for the mention. This is a known issue that we will resolve soon. These graph definitions are meant to be rendered using Mermaid (https://github.com/mermaid-js/mermaid), though this tool has not been added to the current build process.
-
46 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I'd be glad to provide context for your question.
Why is it always the same percentage? Simplicity and consistency for creators. When Bits-in-Extensions was released, it was important that revenue share was consistent and the concept wasn't overly complicated.
Why is it 80-20? This is the result of feedback from creators and developers alike when developing Bits-in-Extensions to find an acceptable balance. Developers can scale revenue through activations across several channels while a single creator can only activate the Extension once. Given that, 80% was the right percentage determined while gathering feedback to incentivize an Extension activation.
Could revenue share customization be beneficial depending on the use case? Yes. It could also add some complexity for creators when deciding whether or not an Extension should be activated.
This feature is not being actively investigated at this time, but may be a concept revisited in the future.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment If you're referring to the "Get Channel Stream Schedule" endpoint, then this is already the case! A maximum of 100 user IDs can be provided with a GET request to /helix/schedule. Please let us know if this addresses your idea or if you are referring to a different endpoint or use case.
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment This is in the docs, but it's not working? Or it's in the docs and working as expected so we can close this suggestion?
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment You can make a panel that only the creator can see from the Creator Dashboard, but these are popout windows for active Extensions. Does that satisfy the use case, or is the request to have them be inset panels in the dashboard?
If the former is fine, then this is possible using the "Live Configuration Path" from the status section when editing a specific Extension version. Only the broadcaster sees this view and it can be opened from within the Quick Actions panel.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi godspeed5, I'm not sure I follow how this applies to developing Twitch Extensions. It sounds like you are providing feedback for broadcasters for their camera, overlays, and amount of communication. Please let me know if I'm misunderstanding, thanks.
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment As someone who is not familiar with TypeScript, I was curious if there was something specific about this typing to include, like how to format or represent it in the docs. OR is this request simply referring to the fact that return values and types are not defined in the Extensions reference page like the API reference?
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Even with the links provided, there are definitely improvements that can be made to present the Authentication is a more clear and concise way. Keeping this open until that work is completed.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Thanks for the suggestion. I'm curious to know why this feature would be useful in third party development; what is your use case and are you aware of others?
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment If a field with the total number of seconds was included, how would this be helpful in your development?
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment @Kaldune For clarification, what occurs in an embed if it cannot be viewed? And do you know why some streams can only be watched on Twitch? I'm curious if this occurs when "Subscriber Streams" is enabled.
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi MrRockis, it sounds like adding the "period" parameter that was available in v5 to the "Get Clips" endpoint in the latest API would satisfy this request. Let me know if that is not a correct assumption.
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Hey Barry, I'm curious to know if this is a common problem seen on the forums. All examples capitalize it, but I can understand the expectation that token_type can be used in the same capitalization that is returned when getting a token.
-
4 votes
AdminJon Bulava
(Developer Relations, Twitch)
shared this idea
·
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I would agree it is a security risk to provide a flag in a user object whether or not they have 2FA enabled. However, I think it's possible for this use case to be realized without exposing the risk if we provided developers a way to require 2FA when authenticating to their application. As such, I will move this back into into "under consideration" given this approach while we discuss further.
-
10 votesAdminJon Bulava
(Developer Relations, Twitch)
shared this idea
·
-
360 votes
We're internally investigating live notification management without an expected launch date at this time
An error occurred while saving the comment The Helix updates in June allow for setting the game and title of a stream. Leaving this idea open to consider an API for the go-live notification.
-
8 votesAdminJon Bulava
(Developer Relations, Twitch)
supported this idea
·
Thank you for your detailed submission and articulating the usefulness of the badge for game developers. We agree with the sentiment and additional context can be found in the deprecation announcement. You are correct that there was an increase in requests to verify organizations. This process is also used to gain access to other features such as Drops campaigns and game analytics. Product updates to limit requests for a global badge and remove confusion, such as enabling the badge only on a matching category as you mention, will take considerable time while continuing to block new developers from using these organization features. This change will reestablish the 1-week SLA for organization requests and an improved implementation of the game developer badge can be considered in the future while we enable new game developers to onboard.