More consistent bans and suspensions (fair and clear rules)
There have been many cases where people have been suspended for blatant rule violations by committing sexual and or vulgar acts, however these ban/suspension durations (if they get banned or suspended at all) seem to be directly related to the large following and income they bring to twitch. it would seem to me and most anyone with access to your site, that it is an unfair practice to simply pick and choose who you decide to allow to break the agreements based off of the monetary value they create. Ive recently started streaming myself, and have had one viewer suspended for simply making a joke that was far less crass than my stream itself, and if the twitch moderators were to review this stream they would see that it was in good fun, my response even reflects how i received the joke in jest. there are cases like "toadphd" where suggested advice is less than safe, but everyone knows its just humor, yet no actions are taken, as they shouldnt be, because it is light hearted viewer interaction. however, "amouranth" and streamers like her all walk right up to the line of your guidelines, spit on them and and cross over them in almost every stream (partial nudity, suggestive sexual behavior, clearly selling her ip for traffic to a more sexual platform), yet every suspension and ban is almost immediately lifted. explain to me how that is equal or fair enforcement. either ban and suspend all of these large streamers with the same magnitude, or simply stop suspending or banning people all together. let the community moderate itself because clearly twitch cant do it with any sense of fairness. Stop the nepotism.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e?size=40&default=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic-cdn.jtvnw.net%2Fjtv_user_pictures%2F4b1b3caf-6c5b-4782-b9e4-788ad0b091e6-profile_image-150x150.png)