Settings and activity
39 results found
-
4 votesDurss shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment -
14 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
39 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Durss commentedI can't agree more.
It feels very wrong to let the user know their messages are not being sent.
At best they will think they used a banword (as it acts the same) and they will try multiple times to send their messages, at worst they will understand they're restricted and unleash their rage. Given that restricted users have high chances to be toxic ones, risks are high they abuse this until they're definitely banned.I personnaly would like to use the "restricted" mode as a shadowban more often when I feel new chatters have high chances to be toxic (because of their nicknames or the content of their first messages), but because of this behavior I basically never use it.
Without this issue, the restricted mode would be a good middle point between "letting the user chat freely" and "not banning them so they're not flagged on shared ban channels" when they're not crossing the line but walking right next to it.
Durss supported this idea · -
4,693 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
7 votesDurss shared this idea ·
-
286 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
40 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
109 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
57 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
281 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
48 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
697 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
370 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
195 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
27 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
22 votesDurss supported this idea ·
-
18 votesDurss shared this idea ·
-
59 votes
We are planning a few updates to subscription payloads, including this item.
Durss supported this idea · -
14 votes
We are looking into this. Thanks for the request!
Durss supported this idea ·
Passing by this topic, since then it's available on eventsub :)