Skip to content
Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

Settings and activity

19 results found

  1. 2,693 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  2. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ligerzero_Gaming commented  · 

    Currently, we're only allowed to have 30 possible Shared Ban Info connections. This is great, but upping the number wouldn't solve a critical problem: large communities being targeted.

    Rather than simply upping the number of possible connections, it would be great if a user could make their Shared Ban Info "public", allowing other users to subscribe to it. It would be a one-way connection, counting against the subscriber's total connections but not against the sharer

    This would allow a community leader to effectively maintain a "master list" that could be easily shared with numerous people and should already work within the basic framework of what's been built.

    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  3. 214 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  4. 477 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  5. 844 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  6. 82 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    16 comments  ·  Bits » Cheering  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  7. 487 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  8. 20 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  9. 470 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ligerzero_Gaming commented  · 

    100% for this, especially a comment period. So many changes have been rolled out with little to know input from the community at large that have detrimentally affected everyone. So many have been rolled out under the table that we've only found out because random creators have gone to do something they've always been able to and it's suddenly gone.

    That's not okay.

    We need lead time on changes. ESPECIALLY if it affects workflows or usage of the site, like the auto-hosting change did.

    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  10. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  11. 525 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Discover » Tags  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  12. 2,063 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    114 comments  ·  Discover » Tags  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ligerzero_Gaming commented  · 

    I'd be fine with 10 tags, but I believe the system probably needs to be increased to around 15 to allow folks to include their identity tags as well as things like "first playthrough" and "no backseating" still. It doesn't feel good to have to pick and choose

    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  13. 75 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Moderation » AutoMod  ·  Admin →
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  14. 498 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    27 comments  ·  Chat » Stream Chat  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  15. 211 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Planned  ·  6 comments  ·  Chat » Feature Request  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  16. 912 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We apply IP bans in Chat based on users' Moderation actions in certain cases. We don't currently plan to publicize the logic we use because we think it would make it easier for bad actors to bypass the restriction.

    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  17. 665 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  18. 3,258 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  · 
  19. 4,044 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ligerzero_Gaming supported this idea  ·