Skip to content
Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 514 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    LxStudio supported this idea  · 
  2. 350 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    LxStudio supported this idea  · 
  3. 755 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    LxStudio commented  · 

    This new proposed limit basically punishes your longest term content creators, speedrunners, and most active streamers who have been streaming and building their communities on this platform in the last decade. Let alone only giving them 2 months to handle transferring 1000+ hrs of hightlighted videos from 10 years is unrealistic. This shows how short-sighted this decision is and how out of touch Twitch is in understanding your long term content creators are the foundations of this platform. At the minimum, partner excemption and perservation of historical content should be considered when a majority of users on this platform are viewers only and would bearly use any storage.

    LxStudio supported this idea  ·