Settings and activity
4 results found
-
287 votes
SpartanDraco
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment SpartanDraco
commented
pretty tired of closed minded people, if tomorrow I can stream at 3000 bits instead of 6000 and it looks the same or better, I will do it, I don't need more, there are many streamers that have to use 7000/8000 because otherwise they get pixelated, in my case I have to use 7000 because the 7900xtx dies a bit in fast motion, if you give me better quality for less, I will do it, I don't need more, if you give me better quality for less, I will do it., of course I will use less, why the **** do I need to use 6000 if it looks the same or better at 4000?the only person who thinks like that, is the possessive and egocentric, I use AV1 on youtube and I make videos at 2k with 10 megabytes per second, 10000 bitrate, games like forza, battlefield, etc, no pixelation, before for the same thing I needed 30/40 megabytes in 264 at 1080p and still pixelated, think that AV1 will not save or generate money, is someone who does not see the future and only thinks the now, but neither take advantage of it or enjoy it, that's called selfishness, VP9 by the way is the equivalent of AV1 youtube, that's why they don't use AV1 first because they have google and its VP9, twitch is still with a codec older than me, my mobile plays native AV1, my old 2012 mobile does it by software, enough excuses, imagine a world where someone living in a village with limited internet, he can stream because he got AV1 and he streams at 3000 and it looks like it used to at 6000, and well, he's a big hit, he's starting to be the new rubius, ibai, auronplay, vegeta, PewDiePie, xqc, etc, they move money, but they couldn't because?, because if they made stream they were petaba them to 6000 so that it was seen "decent", and now they can to 3000 and it is seen equal or better, come on man, that we are not in the century 12
An error occurred while saving the comment SpartanDraco
commented
I'm not going to explain it to you and even less to someone who has a closed mentality to temporary video on demand, like youtube, twitch is a stream platform, and with AV1 it will allow 3000kb to be seen well at 1080p and use 6000kb for example for 2k, and someone in latin america for example could see that stream at 1080p that before could not, if you are not able to understand that, I'm not going to answer you anymore, I made clear in my previous comment the summary, less bandwidth needed to have quality, is less maintenance cost, if you don't understand that 2+2 is 4, it's not my problem.
An error occurred while saving the comment SpartanDraco
commented
people who say that switching to AV1 would not bring more profit, should first think about what it is like to have more than 1 million people stream simultaneously.
-
141 votesSpartanDraco
supported this idea
·
-
197 votesSpartanDraco
supported this idea
·
-
303 votesSpartanDraco
supported this idea
·
@Nightcrawla you do not deserve much response, by the fact that you do not understand my comment, and as the 5 of which I put that are the same, VP9 to this day is vs AV1, because google updates it, but I see that you are not informed at all or updated news, that the first thing, second, I do not read closed minds or respond to them, so feel flattered that at least I have spent a little time returning to a ticket that is practically forgotten, because people who need and ask for AV1 in 2023 does not matter and leave them aside where I include myself because now I use AMD, I know how the market works, technology and companies, I know why they do not put the AV1, and I repeat, excuses.