Skip to content
Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 436 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    IkomaTanomori supported this idea  · 
  2. 4,863 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    IkomaTanomori commented  · 

    The "clarification" made the definition less clear. It now focuses on whether the speech is "polarizing," a subjective definition which boils entirely down to "well if someone reports it then it must be polarizing." The problem will remain the same: trans and queer folk and others targeted by the same kind of mass hate reports will be mass hate reported by organized groups of bad faith users. If Twitch wants to be a safe and usable place on the internet, it is the bad faith hate groups who need to be excluded. It does not need to police how we queer folk talk about ourselves. And if payment processors say that saying gay or trans is sexual content? FIGHT. THEM. IN. COURT. That is your OBLIGATION, Twitch, on behalf of the users who are the CREATORS of ALL the value on your platform - both the streamers AND the viewers, because the unique experience of this form of live entertainment relies on that alchemy of having both. Twitch needs us. Twitch ought to fight for our safety, not make rules that make us less safe.

    IkomaTanomori supported this idea  ·