Skip to content
Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation
← Twitch UserVoice

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. Sensitive social issues Bullet points need to be removed, not 'clarified'

    4,863 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    487 comments  ·  Safety » Content Classification  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SunioMc commented  · 

    How does LGBTQ+ fit into these guidelines? It's not a social issue. It's an individual issue for people who take offence in people, who only want to express themselves in a harmless way. Members of that community just want to be allowed to talk freely just like everyone else.

    Focusing more on what the guidelines say, the goal is to label streams that focus on discussion of the in the article mentioned topics? So what is the line exactly? If a streamer is just chatting with their chat and ends up talking about LGBTQ+ topics for two hours, is that a focused discussion? Or does that still count as intermittent as it wasn't the focus when the streamer went live?

    If you still decide that LGBTQ+ is a social issue, make CLEAR LINES of what needs to be labeled. You know... It's supposed to be a guideLINE not a guide-vague-interpretative-area.

    SunioMc supported this idea  ·