Settings and activity
2 results found
-
427 votes
This experiment is now closed as the new mobile redesign is rolling out to all users. Thank you for all your feedback during the experiment. We released an update to respect your autoplay settings in the feed, muted the feed on open by default (you can adjust this in your settings), and added mute functionality directly to the feed to give you more control over your viewing experience. We also enabled PIP over feed and have been continuing to improve app performance since launch. Learn more about the new app on our blog and continue to share feedback with us on the improved experience in the mobile category on UserVoice.
Sakurai1996
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
88 votesSakurai1996
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Sakurai1996
commented
Ok. Charity's view: It might be better to not let banned users to be using the charity as a proxy for an end to their means.
Streamer's view: It is better to let banned users stay banned universally. If they were banned it had a reason.
Viewers' view: It is better to not let banned users interact with stream. They are banned for a reason and if I get to interact but still adhere to rules, and they don't then it is inequality.
Counterpoint to "Changed man" argument: 1)they can directly donate to charity. 2)they can show this change of heart in ban appeal message if they weren't heated enough to use it selfishly. 3)unless streamer decides that watching stream is also banned for them, they should be able to enjoy contents of stream, donate to cause indirectly, but still suffer consequences of their messages via no chat ability.
Result: It is actually better to apply ban of a person, universally. Only caveat is that mods and streamer cannot be corrupt. So we need a way to check that also. Not for innocent streamers but for malicious ones.
An error occurred while saving the comment Sakurai1996
commented
I think even though users are banned, if they want to contribute monetarily, they should be able to. But since they are also banned, they shouldn't be given any spotlight if they do so. Basically a shadow donator status. They either have to donate for donation's cause and get no acknowledgement or just leave.
Revert back to previous layout of UI. This is not tiktok. If we want to see short videos of creators, that's fine as a story bubbles on top line. But don't disrupt established scroll in main screen. I don't want my whole screen to be allocated to one person (that isn't also automatically selected from my followed list) without my permission to do so. Please revert back the UI and update as a whole and DON'T FORGET TO ADD BACK THE MORE OPTIONS BUTTON ON PROFILE PAGES OF OTHER USERS. WE CANNOT WHISPER THEM UNLESS THEY HAVE SENT A MESSAGE IN CHAT.