Skip to content
Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    DemiTheVampireKing shared this idea  · 
  2. 7,980 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    DemiTheVampireKing commented  · 

    HOW MANY TIMES, TWITCH?
    HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO DO THIS SONG AND DANCE. YOU SHOEHORN AI OVER ACTUAL HUMAN TALENT, AND THE INTERNET SAYS "NO!" AND YOU BACK PEDAL.
    NO AI, DAN CLANCY. NONE. HIRE AN ACTUAL ARTIST TO MAKE THE WORKS. PEOPLE WOULD KILL TO GET THE AMOUNT OF EYES ON THEIR WORK THAT TWITCH BRINGS.
    Probably at most 5K to get licencing for basically complete ownership and commercial use for the work, AND you're supporting an artist on the platform, instead of consistently giving them a middle finger by supporting the theft machine.
    You forget artists rule the internet. You keep shoving away artists, you will only bring about your ruin.
    "For Humans, By Humans." Not "For Humans, By Machines."

    DemiTheVampireKing supported this idea  ·