Skip to content
Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Croixer supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Croixer commented  · 

    1) Limitation would be great idea, for system as it is now. (Maybe not necessary when this system will be fully working, setting UI feels pretty crowded now on 1366*768 resolution monitor).
    2) From time to time it is not problem (for example youtube has working auto quality). But i don't know what parametrs are used to decide when switch quality. For example: If is every 15 seconds checked my bandwith and only on this decision is my quality raised, then it is troublesome for people with "laggy/spiky" network connection, because it can hit the high download speed moment. On the other side, if quality would be changed after x succesfull checks, then it wouldn't make buffering happen so often. It would be for a price of longer wait before quality raise, but I think it is way better then previous variant i wrote where you have to wait for video to buffer and lower quality again.

    While I was writing this feedback I had buffering happen like in 3-5 min intervals on auto, if I remember correctly. I just saw going video quality up and shortly after went into buffering. Can test it again tommorow if you want more precise info.

    Croixer shared this idea  ·