Skip to content
Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 158 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    KOneSix supported this idea  · 
  2. 16,629 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    KOneSix supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    KOneSix commented  · 

    If Twitch as a company ever cared about ethical business practices, then AI should never have been in the plans in the first place. As a bare minimum of a compromise to let you proceed with such a terribly abused technology that is flawed by design that continues to harm both society (employment loss) and the environment, we expect (and again, as a BARE MINIMUM OF A COMPROMISE FOR ANY OF US TO TOLERATE YOUR UNETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICE THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN GOVERNED BY LAW) for the default to be opt-out and manual opt-in is required for content creators who explicitly give consent to the cause of memory shortages, ecosystem damage, mass employment loss, and the abandonment of the consumer market for affordable technology. And that requires the ENTIRETY of that content to actually be under the content creator's ownership, otherwise their consent is nullified since it falls under piracy. Or are you saying piracy is legal for those training AI models, but not for anyone else? We doing selective piracy now? We changing the law? Is that the hypocrisy you're looking forward to doing?