Skip to content
Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

Settings and activity

2 results found

  1. 1,142 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Planned  ·  Anonymous responded

    We’re reviewing this. Curious how long you think would be ok.

    SpawnOfThespis supported this idea  · 
  2. 1,169 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    SpawnOfThespis supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    SpawnOfThespis commented  · 

    REQUIRING A MOBILE PHONE FOR 2FA IS DISCRIMINATORY AND SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.

    I am being penalized for my private choice of phone service and/or for being poor; both of which are illegal.

    I am eligible for Affiliate but can't continue because of my phone. I use Republic Wireless because I am extremely poor and it is one of the best deals out there to have a mobile number. It is my only number. I've had it for over 7 years so it is legitimate. I literally don't have a choice for phone number. Republic is a legitimate company so this is literally the same as if someone was being denied for having Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, or any other carrier.
    MY CHOICE OF PHONE CARRIER SHOULD NEVER BE A FACTOR.
    I have email verification enabled for security. I use it to log in with a new verification number every day which is more than most security protocols.