Skip to content
Translate Ideas and Comments
Choose language:
There was an error during translation

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. 22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Malisbad supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Malisbad commented  · 

    It doesn't pass the front end validator, but they check the password strength anyways (on the BE for some reason) to power their indicator. That probably has insufficient guarding on the backend (any number of things), and returns a -1 score for password strength. That yields a second error that quickly overwrites the original length error, and it looks silly. The problem lies _mostly_ on their backend because it shows that their validators aren't aligned, and their strength function provides incorrect results. It could be a source of problems for them.