What is a greater hypocrisy in late stage capitalism than a social media platform that is about any voice speaking about anything being sponsored by a corporate overlord that profits from many of the things those *using* free speech are speaking about?
Twitch, isn't it morally contradictory to promote Twitch-con, to promote highly visible political commentators like Hasan, whilst taking money from a corporation that directly benefits from war profiteering, climate change and more?
Are you not saying to your platform that you do not respect the ability to speak freely, to criticise, to disagree, to be activist *against* such an association as the one you have with Chevron?
There *are* better companies.
There *are* better associations.
There *are* better ways.
Isn't the first step in that *listening* to your end users Twitch?
Isn't the first most important thing you do acknowledge your genuine responsibility to represent them? To *respect* them?
What is a greater hypocrisy in late stage capitalism than a social media platform that is about any voice speaking about anything being sponsored by a corporate overlord that profits from many of the things those *using* free speech are speaking about?
Twitch, isn't it morally contradictory to promote Twitch-con, to promote highly visible political commentators like Hasan, whilst taking money from a corporation that directly benefits from war profiteering, climate change and more?
Are you not saying to your platform that you do not respect the ability to speak freely, to criticise, to disagree, to be activist *against* such an association as the one you have with Chevron?
There *are* better companies.
There *are* better associations.
There *are* better ways.
Isn't the first step in that *listening* to your end users Twitch?
Isn't the first most important thing you do acknowledge your genuine responsibility to represent them? To *respect* them?
To do *better*?