Settings and activity
36 results found
-
6 votes
ZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Heyhey,
So shedding some more light onto this.
While we are going to be working on a proper way to remove ‘bad pages, and duplicates’, this project is likely going to come in several phases.The initial phase is removing the pages form the site, and stop syncing them with the API.
The later phase would be us building tools to automatically swap the game IDs on lists, reviews, etc.. which would take care of this.Thanks!
ZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Hi there! We couldn't agree more that we need something to differentiate official and unofficial content and we've been discussing for a while how we can do that. We are currently investigating ways forward to make sure that when we do this, it's done correctly. Thanks for the great suggestion!
ZeroesOnes
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
Heya! Thank you for the honest feedback, it does mean a lot and we totally understand such frustrations. I can add some context on where IGDB is at the moment, but first i can say that it is absolutely still our plan to return to the website development and just like you the team is very eager to improve on the potential it has :)
An acquisition is a complex matter from an engineering perspective, from months prior the public announcement we had set deadlines to migrate infrastructure, services, security systems etc.. to align with our new teams. That took significant time and effort, during which we had to put development of the website on hold beyond basic maintenance (unfortunately). Once done we decided to focus on growth of our core product as a database. Which is why the main product updates we made have been around our contributing users,…
ZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
Hey!
Yesterday we released the first phase of a project to redo version which helps this. We do still have versions, but going forward it will only be used for editions indeed.
we added support for Remake, Remasters, Expanded Games, Ports, and Forks. Any of these won’t need to be marked as a Version anymore :)ZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
49 votesZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
-
81 votes
Heya!
There’s absolutely a need for multiple covers as a data point, we hear you :) Let’s clarify what this could mean in the near future:
One thing that we are currently looking at is expanding data for Localization, and covers are an obvious fit for this. However it’s worth pointing that Localized cover and additional cover might not mean the same thing. For example offering the Japanese specific cover doesn’t mean having multiple variant for it (different artworks, logo style, dimensions etc..).
We will start with Localization, which will help provide API users more options for their own communities. And as a second step from there we would begin looking at how to offer multiple variant of a single regional cover so that users may pick & choose.
Hope this helps!
ZeroesOnes
supported this idea
·
