on one channel I am being singled out above all others saying "you need to subscribe"
the thing is I have supported the persons channel with a gift using paypal but this broadcaster either does not remember or ignored the support I provided. I also bought a tee shirt at close to $30 for a total of $80 in support. I just sent him a copy of the paypal transaction.
so I am recommending that you add to your Community guidelines that content creators are not to single out and harass people on there cat. I have already had to defend my self on another persons chat

Pretty simple actually. With the new Steam policies about getting more NSFW games and more Illusion Games SFW versions in the same platform, i'm sure that list is pretty outdated and needs more games getting banned. (Koikatsu: Party is SFW if you don't include a specific patch from the official game to be NSFW).
And not more sexually, high gruesome or extreme violence should be there too, Hatred is the best example nowadays and isn't include in the list. Postal 2 isn't neccesary for being more ironic & sartastic rather than polemic because yes.
Games being bad and only popular for the things i mentioned earlier should be there too.
More than that, probably i missed something but the idea in general is explained. I saw earlier the counterpart of this idea and that's good, but not in a plataform like this when anything NSFW (even accidentaly) could get you banned.
That's all.
PD: I'm not a English native speaker so probably there's typos.

Hello Twitch,

Over the past year I have seen a number of people popping up who making claims of been representatives and/or advocates of protected groups (to be more precise people with disabilities), on major platforms such as Youtube, Twitter and Twitch. What disturbs me about this is lack of professionalism some of these people exhibit, I hope you do understand that a lot of people do want to private, discrete and above all be treated with respect when it comes to their disability. It does disturb me when I see certain partnered Twitch streamers use other disabled people's conditions and in a few cases their deaths to bully and harass other disabled people.

I would like ask Twitch to add to it's community guidelines that users are not allowed to make public claims of been representatives or advocates of this protected group. I am not saying people cannot claim to be a supporter or activist for disabled people or that a disabled person is an example of what other disabled people may be like. What I am saying is unless you have a legal paper to say you represent another person and/or group and are authorized by that party to speak on their behalf, you should not be making the claim to be a representative or advocate.

Thank you for your time.

I reported this guy like 15 times, i banned him more than 30 accounts, all accounts, with the same description always, no nos conocemos pero sabemos que (account name) es genial. he followed me, i went to his 12 minutes old channel, he got more than 75 follows in 12 minutes, 2k visits, and he got 2 guys sayibng thx on his chat for the follow. yesterday i banned and reported 4 accounts, went to a 5k viewers channel @x6flipin and he with an account alredy reported from me zacarias or something, and he went to the chat, saying that he dont give a **** the mods, that they ban him, so the streamer and 5k ppl, say his name, so he gains something, im not the only one who is disturbed by this guys and his NETWORK of accounts, without content, if he streams, he makes 1 minute stream, blackscreen, and he waits, that the baits continue, i spoke with him, and say i wll report all his accounts, you know what he said? "I will lag your twitch" if you want to see it, his user is "LUNARBRIDGEBRO" im reporting everyday, but he got 5 or 10 new accounts everyday, and im a guy who streamed for more than 5 years, more than 3000 hrs, and always 0 viewers, so for him, im the perfect victim, my guess is that he is creating a network of views, and maybe sell that later, or sell accounts with a lot o follows, please, im alone here, nobody but me is reporting this, im tired of reporting 7 accounts a day, this is too much for me, i like the platform, but i cant stand this day, after day, and seeing how he laughs of your platform, disturb a lot of ppl who is trying to do something on a platform that only benefits ppl with 100 o 5k viewers, and the ppl like me, never got a view, i got 340 follows, and nobody comes to my streams, and i stream 5 to 11 hors everyday, so pls help me.i cant stand that.
i will list all the accounts that i remember so you can track: hope you do something, because this is very personal and now, he is chassing me everyday, i dont want BOTS, adn that is illegal right? so ban his IP and his MOTHERBOARD, only way, if not, he will continue creating accounts everyday. STOP THIS NOW
lunarbridgebro
weartag
uwuKumi
bulletv7
ardax26672
THOSE ARE SOOME OF THE BOTS ACCOUNTS, PLS HELP ME!! im from spain, and i cant stand this no more, its frustrating beaing a nobody and being this unlucky...

I am certain that we have all reported a user on Twitch before, as I have since making my account in early 2017. However, recently, after reporting a user, I received an email saying "We've actioned on your report" in regards to a report that I submitted previously.

There was very little present in that email. It simply told me that my safety report was reviewed and staff determined that a violation of the Terms of Service and Community Guidelines had occurred, and proper enforcement action has been taken. That is it. That is all that was included in the email. For an email that is supposed to update you on what happened after a report in regards to a very serious issue, there was very little to get out of that email. A lot of the things that, in my opinion, should have been included in that were simply absent. Here is what I would like to change about it:

Include the original report(s)
This would serve two very important purposes: it will tell you the user who you reported and what they were reported for. As someone who has reported a lot of accounts, especially this year when I have had a lot more time to stream on Twitch, it is difficult for me to know who the user I reported was. Including the original report would allow me to see exactly what user I reported. Including the original report would also remind me of what all I reported the user for and what evidence I presented or was available at the time, which is relevant to a safety report such as the one I submitted. The exact details I reported are not relevant to these suggestions, but understand that the situation I reported has extended to platforms beyond Twitch even after the report. Including the report(s) that were considered would address both of these problems.

Describe the enforcement action taken
Safety reports or reports concerning Community Guidelines or Terms of Service violations may involve things such as abuse, threats or acts of harassment, bullying, and many more things in which someone may experience long-term harm. Again, while I do not believe the details of my report are relevant, the things that I reported have the potential to cause long-lasting damage for the people affected. In the case of a reported abuser, it will most definitely bring comfort to the victims knowing that the abuser will have their account terminated and will no longer be able to create additional accounts. It does not have to be anything complex, it can be something as simple as "The account of the user who you have reported has been terminated and indefinitely suspended from the use of our services." As long as it lets the person who submitted know that something more than just a warning or a suspension had occurred.

Whether or not both of these changes are enacted, more should be included in an email describing that action was taken following a user report.

I occasionally see streamers who promote therapy or claim to have mental health issues, when they really are not qualified to be involving themselves in such matters. Even worse are the situations where it's clear (or it cannot really be verified) that a streamer is claiming to have a problem, just so they can solicit for subs/donations/boost their social media presence.

I think the topic of mental health is just too personal and risky for someone with no background in treating mental illness (or appears to be pan-handling) to be discussing on their channel. I think beyond telling a viewer they may want to look into seeking professional help (if there is a situation where this is necessary), there needs to be more restriction on what topics a streamer can discuss/personal information they can disclose.

I think the title says enough, we can all think for ourselves.

We have a right to expression as we have a right to be offended. Please don't destroy this great platform of personal expression by buying into false logic.

The effort put into encouraging individuals to choose to dismiss certain viewpoints is far more realistic and beneficial than preventing it from being manifested.

The majority of "unsavory" content expressed on your platform is done ironically: to take this too seriously and censor it is an insult to the people that make your platform real and viable.

I understand the obligation to keep people safe, but it should not be something done so lightly. This is a passing phase and my personal view is that this "cancel culture" is a passing phase that will be met with significant backlash once it hits a certain threshold. Does twitch want to be on board with reality, or onboard with a passing political climate?

I belive the long-term success of twitch is more likely to come from a stance where freedom of expression is tolerated, and a respect for the audience's intelligence is upheld given we can think for ourselves and choose to be offended or not.

In this regard, offense taken by certain rhetoric in this setting, which is often misinterpreted, is a choice and your focus should be on empowering individuals to be bigger than it, rather than excluding it altogether.

Under the new harassment policies being implemented in January, Twitch has effectively identified foreign nationals who have migrated to another country (e.g., to the United States) as a protected group (the term "immigration status" is invoked as an example of what constitutes a protected class). The policy later states that saying "[protected group] should not be allowed to vote" constitutes "[a call] for subjugation, segregation or exclusion." It seems to me that this policy entails that anyone who advocates enforcing the voting requirements of probably every single nation on earth (i.e., every nation prohibits non-citizens from voting) is guilty of hateful conduct.

More concretely, supposing I were to say, "Non-U.S. citizens should not be allowed to vote in U.S. elections," it seems to me that this would make me guilty of hateful conduct under the terms of the policy. By extension, anyone in favor of upholding the U.S. Constitution as it stands would be guilty of hateful conduct. I'm sure this is not the intent of the policy, and I doubt that it would be enforced in this way. Still, this does seem to be a section of the policy that might need some more work.